Learning Center
We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Understanding the New Marijuana Tax Battle in Michigan

Michigan finds itself in the spotlight once again due to a significant debate surrounding cannabis policy—a freshly minted 24% wholesale marijuana tax is at the heart of a constitutional dispute. As the first hearing unfolds, this case is attracting national interest, given its implications on cannabis pricing and the broader impact on voter-led statutory measures and tax policy nationwide.

No matter if you're a cannabis user or reside far from Michigan, this legal battle is noteworthy. Its outcome might influence how other jurisdictions conceive, adapt, and uphold cannabis tax frameworks and could presage similar legal conflicts as the cannabis sector burgeons.

Here’s what you need to know about the case.

Image 1

What Is Michigan’s New Tax Proposal?

Included in the 2025–2026 fiscal plan, Michigan legislators greenlit a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, purposed to fund road enhancements. This tax would impact the supply chain much earlier—prior to products reaching dispensary outlets.

Currently, Michigan enforces two other taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on retail cannabis, ratified by voters back in 2018.

  • A standard 6% state sales tax. Should the wholesale tax go into effect, it would rank among the top-tiered cannabis tax regimens in the nation.

Why Did the Cannabis Industry Sue?

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) contends that the tax is unconstitutional. Their principal argument is:

The 2018 marijuana statute enacted by voters cannot be altered without a supermajority legislative vote.

The Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), approved by the electorate, commands safeguards. Any legislative modification demands a three-fourths supermajority.

The legislature sanctioned the wholesale tax absent of this threshold—merely a simple majority sufficed.

MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol illuminated the issue as reported by Michigan Advance:
“As the leading cannabis trade association, we’re here in court fighting to protect the will of Michigan voters.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Industry insiders caution this tax would inflate costs, challenge small enterprises, and potentially redirect consumers to unsanctioned marketplaces—a common occurrence in high-tax states like California.

Image 2

Schedule a Complimentary Meeting
Learn how we can help serve your business needs.
Schedule Here

What Is the State’s Justification?

Michigan's administration maintains the tax's legality on these grounds:

  • The wholesale tax represents a new tax—not an amendment to the 2018 voter-affirmed law.

  • Legislative bodies hold the prerogative to introduce taxes for fiscal requirements.

  • Its intent is to bankroll road infrastructure without adjusting cannabis policy itself.

Should the judiciary side with the government, the tax might be activated on January 1, 2026.

Potential Impact on Consumers

Although the issue is localized, the effects of cannabis tax models often ripple nationwide. If the tax withstands legal scrutiny:

  • Prices at the wholesale tier will escalate.

  • Retail costs might rise in response.

  • Some patrons might gravitate towards lower-cost, unregulated venues.

  • Smaller firms may encounter financial strain or consolidation pressures.

Conversely, should the tax be invalidated, Michigan's current taxation environment—a comparatively low-cost framework—remains preserved.

National Significance of This Case

Despite the litigation's origins in Michigan, its reverberations could extend beyond state lines.

1. Testing Boundaries of Voter-Enacted Laws

If legislative authorities can append taxes without a supermajority consent, it may redefine ballot initiative operations in any state utilizing them.

2. Influencing State Cannabis Tax Strategies

States grappling with underfunded public works might mirror such taxes if Michigan’s passes.

3. Highlighting Cannabis Tax Discrepancies Nationwide

Some regions (e.g., Oregon, Michigan) maintain modest cannabis levies, maintaining product competitiveness. Others (e.g., California) face high taxes driving illicit trade.

Image 3

What Lies Ahead?

A Michigan Court of Claims judge has reviewed initial arguments and is poised to issue a ruling shortly. The matter may eventually ascend to the Michigan Supreme Court.

The verdict is bound to be consequential—not only for Michigan’s cannabis sector but as a precedent in handling voter-derived statutes, nascent industries, and fiscal governance nationwide.

Schedule a Complimentary Meeting
Learn how we can help serve your business needs.
Schedule Here
Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .